LCD TVsReviewsTVs

LG 43UJ6517 vs 49UJ7507 Ultra HD TV comparison review

Picture quality

Picture analysis and calibration performed using Portrait Displays Calman 2017 Ultimate for Business software, SpectraCal C6 colorimeter and VideoForge and Murideo Fresco SIX-G pattern generator.

calman2017-splash

LG 43UJ6517 tested with software version 03.60.05.

LG 49UJ7507 tested with software version 03.60.09.

Factory characteristics Value UJ65 UJ65 Value UJ75  UJ75  Comment
ANSI contrast

(factory SDR, 200 cd/m2 peak luminance)

1378:1 1 902:1 (local dimming off) 1 Poor, inline with IPS technology.

UJ75: 1173:1 (local low), 1645:1 (mid), 1648:1 (max)

ANSI black level [cd/m2] 

(SDR)

0.144 1 0.225 (local dimming off) 1 Poor, inline with IPS technology.

UJ75: 0.173 (local low), 0.105 (mid), 0.074 (max)

Peak luminance in SDR [cd/m2]

(SDR)

357 2 469 2 Full screen coverage.
Peak luminance in HDR [cd/m2] 

(Vivid – HDR)

 356 1 585 2  Note: 10% of the screen covered;
UJ65: Cinema home peak: 292 nits, Cinema: 219 nitsUJ75: Cinema peak: 548 nits
Peak luminance in HDR after 1 minute [cd/m2] 

(HDR)

 356 4 585 4 Luminance should not fall lower than 5% of initial measurement, in this case excellent result.
Greyscale errors (SDR)

(calibrated state is < 3)

4.5 3 7.5 2  /
Color errors (SDR)

(calibrated state is < 3)

 7.1 2  8.3 2  /
Rec.709 coverage (CIE 1976 u’v’) 98.9 % 4 99.5 % 4 Acceptable range is 97%+
DCI-P3 coverage (CIE 1976 u’v’)  79 % 1 81.4 % 1 For more results check this overview.
Rec.2020 coverage (CIE 1976 u’v’)  57.4 % (info) 59.7 % (info) /
Calibration controls / 4 /  4 Gamma and White Balance 20 points, WB for dark and bright, CMS
Average: 2.3 2.3

Note: unless mentioned differently, all factory values from the most accurate preset, in this case Expert Bright (SDR) / Cinema (HDR)

* – grades 1-4, 1 = bad, 2 = average3 = good, 4 = excellent

LG 43UJ6517 LG 49UJ7507
lg-43uj6517-uj65-sdr-calibration lg-49uj7507-uj75-sdr-calibration
lg-43uj6517-uj65-hdr-calibration lg-49uj7507-uj75-hdr-calibration

You can get settings after calibration by visiting my Payhip store >>

paragraph-separator-divider

Panel quality and backlight features

Characteristic UJ65 UJ75  Comment
Backlight uniformity 3 2 slighly worse on UJ75 due to slight light bleed around the edges – on UJ65 edges just slightly darker, but not as dark as on previous LG’s direct LED IPS TVs
Dirty screen effect (DSE) 3 3 subtle, not distracting
Screen reflections 3 3 semi-glossy screen in both cases, moderately reduces glare and reflections
Viewing angles 3 3 good, inline with IPS technology (just a bit better on UJ75)
Anomalies 2 2 IPS glow, faint vertical streaks on UJ75
Global/Local dimming 3 3 no global issues present, local dimming on UJ75 can be completely turned off
Average:  2.83  2.66

* – grades 1-4, 1 = bad, 2 = average3 = good, 4 = excellent

lg-led-lcd-pixel-structure
WRGB IPS pixel structure on both TVs

paragraph-separator-divider

Signal processing

Characteristic
Value UJ65 UJ65 Value UJ75 UJ75  Comment
Motion resolution (Monoscope test, max. 1080) 250 max.  1 250 max. 1 typical result for a 60 Hz LED LCD TV, no blur reduction option
Motion resolution (visual) /  2 / 2 typical for a 60 Hz IPS LCD panel – loss of details in motion, doubling effect, but no significant deterioration in darker scenes (e.g. traces not becoming very long like on VA LCD panels)
24 Hz playback (SDR) /  3 / 3 very good, smooth playback with a small amount of judder (judder reduction available)
Scaling /  3 / 3 good scaling for SD and HD content
Interlaced signals /  4 / 4 passed all tested interlaced signal cadences
Judder reduction / 2 / 2 available, intensity can be manually adjusted via TruMotion User option
Color Upsampling /  2 / 3 stairstepping a bit more visible on UJ65
Reduction of noise / 3 / 3 very effective for noise, average MPEG noise reduction
Banding – SDR /  4 / 4 excellent, without steps
Average: 2.66  2.77

* – grades 1-4, 1 = bad, 2 = average3 = good, 4 = excellent

 

paragraph-separator-divider

High Dynamic Range (HDR) and Wider Color Gamut (WCG) in UHD content

Characteristic
UJ65 UJ75  Comment
Details in shadows 1 1 due to low contrast, details not clearly presented; local dimming on UJ75 can be very distracting (especially with CinemaScope movies)
Details in highlights 1 2 better tone mapping on UJ75 improves picture in this aspect
Overall picture dynamics 1 2 due to higher peak luminance and local dimming, UJ75 is just a bit better
WCG – color rendering 1 1 neither is possible to display significantly more colors compared to Rec.709
24p UHD playback 3 3 very good, smooth playback with a small amount of judder (judder reduction available)
Banding – HDR 3 3 not noticeable steps due to 10-bit panels
Resolution 3 3 despite using WRGB panel, sharpness is excellent
Average:  1.85 2.14 

* – grades 1-4, 1 = bad, 2 = average3 = good, 4 = excellent

 

paragraph-separator-divider

Picture quality – overall

Overall UJ65 UJ75
1. Factory picture and calibration 2.30 2.30
2. Panel quality 2.83 2.66
3. Signal processing 2.66 2.77
4. UHD, HDR & WCG 1.85 2.14
Total score: 2.41 2.46

* – grades 1-4, 1 = bad, 2 = average3 = good, 4 = excellent

With the overall scores so close, it is clear that both models are very similar in their performance. HDR performance is also similar, but for those who are interested in the ability to playback both HDR-10 and Dolby Vision, UJ75 is a better choice.

Winner: LG 49UJ7507

paragraph-separator-divider

Previous page 1 2 3Next page

Darko Hlušička

Founder of HD Televizija website. Certified ISF calibrator(Level II). Tech enthusiast since the 90s. Loves movie soundtracks.

5 komentara

  1. Thank you for your work!
    Where can i find the LG TV Line-up 2017 with all the details and specificiations?
    Thanks!

  2. Zdravo Darko,
    sta mislis o Lg 49uj634v za 550€ kad ga usporedis sa uj750v za 750€? Je li uj75 toliko bolji, da vredi platiti tu razliku ili koji bi drugi tv u tom rangu preporucio(a da nije android). Znam da si vec spominjao samsunge mu6000+ serije i inace nemam nista protiv ali kad sam u trgovini usporedjivao sliku modela 49mu6172 i uj634v, mi se mnogo vise svidjala slika na lgju. Na samsungu je puno vise “kocila” u brzim scenama na demo filmu. Mozda je to bila samo slucajnost. Gledalo bi se vise, manje serije/filmove preko usb-a i plex aplikacije, i sd/hd kanale, ponekad i ps4. Mozda bih dosla u obzir i 55″ velicina, jer bi se gledalo sa udaljenosti 2.2m-2.8m

  3. Hi Darrko,

    I have the same UJ7550 model, but in its 43″ version. The TV came with LG’s Magic Remote, model AN-MR650A. I’m now wondering if this remote can be a universal remote so I could use it also on my STB (from my Cable TV provider). On http://www.lg.com, they say it can be used as a universal remote, but I went through all settings, options and didn’t find a way how to set it up. Could you please help me out?
    Thanks and kind regards,
    Josip

  4. Lg provides the best model of HD Tv. In this article, you describe the two model but ultra HD Lg Tv is the best t use in the home. And It review is very nice. which is very helpful to me. so, I am using the Apple TV which is working very good. if I have any problem when I go to the website https://applesupportnumber.net/apple-tv-support/ which provides the best support.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Također pogledajte
Close
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Molimo podržite naš rad tako da onemogućite blokiranje oglasa na ovoj stranici - hvala! Please support our work by disabling Adblock in your browser - thank you!